|

Getting the most out of knowledge workers will be the key to
business success for the next quarter century. Here's how we do
it at Google.
At
Google, we think business guru Peter Drucker well understood how
to manage the new breed of "knowledge workers." After all,
Drucker invented the term in 1959. He says knowledge workers
believe they are paid to be effective, not to work 9 to 5, and
that smart businesses will "strip away everything that gets in
their knowledge workers' way." Those that succeed will attract
the best performers, securing "the single biggest factor for
competitive advantage in the next 25 years."
At
Google, we seek that advantage. The ongoing debate about
whether big corporations are mismanaging knowledge workers
is one we take very seriously, because those who don't get
it right will be gone. We've drawn on good ideas we've seen
elsewhere and come up with a few of our own. What follows
are ten key principles we use to make knowledge workers most
effective. As in most technology companies, many of our
employees are engineers, so we will focus on that particular
group, but many of the policies apply to all sorts of
knowledge workers.
-
Hire by committee. Virtually every person who
interviews at Google talks to at least half-a-dozen
interviewers, drawn from both management and potential
colleagues. Everyone's opinion counts, making the hiring
process more fair and pushing standards higher. Yes, it
takes longer, but we think it's worth it. If you hire great
people and involve them intensively in the hiring process,
you'll get more great people. We started building this
positive feedback loop when the company was founded, and it
has had a huge payoff.
-
Cater to their every need. As Drucker says, the goal
is to "strip away everything that gets in their way." We
provide a standard package of fringe benefits, but on top of
that are first-class dining facilities, gyms, laundry rooms,
massage rooms, haircuts, carwashes, dry cleaning, commuting
buses – just about anything a hardworking engineer might
want. Let's face it: programmers want to program, they don't
want to do their laundry. So we make it easy for them to do
both.
-
Pack them in. Almost every project at Google is a
team project, and
teams have to
communicate. The best way to make communication easy is
to put team members within a few feet of each other. The
result is that virtually everyone at Google shares an
office. This way, when a programmer needs to confer with a
colleague, there is immediate access: no telephone tag, no
e-mail delay, no waiting for a reply. Of course, there are
many conference rooms that people can use for detailed
discussion so that they don't disturb their office mates.
Even the CEO shared an office at Google for several months
after he arrived. Sitting next to a knowledgeable employee
was an incredibly effective educational experience.
-
Make coordination easy. Because all members of a team
are within a few feet of one another, it is relatively easy
to coordinate
projects. In addition to physical proximity, each
Googler e-mails a snippet once a week to his work group
describing what he has done in the last week. This gives
everyone an easy way to track what everyone else is up to,
making it much easier to monitor progress and synchronize
work flow.
-
Eat your own dog food. Google workers use the
company's tools intensively. The most obvious tool is the
Web, with an internal Web page for virtually every project
and every task. They are all indexed and available to
project participants on an as-needed basis. We also make
extensive use of other information-management tools, some of
which are eventually rolled out as products. For example,
one of the reasons for Gmail's success is that it was beta
tested within the company for many months. The use of e-mail
is critical within the organization, so Gmail had to be
tuned to satisfy the needs of some of our most demanding
customers – our knowledge workers.
-
Encourage creativity. Google engineers can spend up
to 20 percent of their time on a project of their choice.
There is, of course, an approval process and some oversight,
but basically we want to allow creative people to
be creative. One of our not-so-secret weapons is our
ideas mailing list: a companywide suggestion box where
people can post ideas ranging from parking procedures to the
next killer app. The software allows for everyone to comment
on and rate ideas,
permitting the best ideas to percolate to the
top.
-
Strive to reach consensus. Modern corporate mythology
has the unique decision maker as hero. We adhere to the view
that the "many are smarter than the few," and solicit a
broad base of views before
reaching any decision.
At Google, the role of the manager is that of an aggregator
of viewpoints, not the dictator of decisions. Building a
consensus sometimes takes longer, but always produces a more
committed team and better decisions.
-
Don't be evil. Much has been written about Google's
slogan, but we really try to live by it, particularly in the
ranks of management. As in every organization, people are
passionate about their views. But nobody throws chairs at
Google, unlike management practices used at some other
well-known technology companies. We foster to create an
atmosphere of tolerance and respect, not a company full of
yes men.
-
Data drive decisions. At Google, almost every
decision is based on quantitative analysis. We've built
systems to manage information, not only on the Internet at
large, but also internally. We have dozens of analysts who
plow through the data, analyze performance metrics and plot
trends to keep us as up to date as possible. We have a raft
of online "dashboards" for every business we work in that
provide up-to-the-minute snapshots of where we are.
-
Communicate effectively. Every Friday we have an
all-hands assembly with announcements, introductions and
questions and answers. (Oh, yes, and some food and drink.)
This allows management to stay in touch with what our
knowledge workers are thinking and vice versa. Google has
remarkably broad dissemination of information within the
organization and remarkably few serious leaks. Contrary to
what some might think, we believe it is the first fact that
causes the second: a trusted work force is a loyal work
force.
Of
course, we're not the only company that follows these practices.
Many of them are common around Silicon Valley. And we recognize
that our management techniques have to evolve as the company
grows. There are several problems that we (and other companies
like us) face.
One is
"techno arrogance." Engineers are competitive by nature and they
have low tolerance for those who aren't as driven or as
knowledgeable as they are. But almost all engineering projects
are team projects; having a smart but inflexible person on a
team can be deadly. If we see a recommendation that says
"smartest person I've ever known" combined with "I wouldn't ever
want to work with them again," we decline to make them an offer.
One reason for extensive peer interviews is to make sure that
teams are enthused about the new team member. Many of our best
people are terrific role models in terms of team building, and
we want to keep it that way.
A
related problem is the not-invented-here syndrome. A good
engineer is always convinced that he can build a better system
than the existing ones, leading to the refrain "Don't buy it,
build it." Well, they may be right, but we have to focus on
those projects with the biggest payoff. Sometimes this means
going outside the company for products and services.
Another issue that we will face in the coming years is the
maturation of the company, the industry and our work force.
We, along with other firms in this industry, are in a rapid
growth stage now, but that won't go on forever. Some of our
new workers are fresh out of college; others have families
and extensive job experience. Their interests and needs are
different. We need to provide benefits and a work
environment that will be attractive to all ages.
A
final issue is making sure that as Google grows, communication
procedures keep pace with our increasing scale. The Friday
meetings are great for the Mountain View team, but Google is now
a global organization.
We
have focused on
managing creativity and
innovation, but that's not the only thing that matters at
Google. We also have to manage day-to-day operations, and it's
not an easy task. We are building technology infrastructure that
is dramatically larger, more complex and more demanding than
anything that has been built in history. Those who plan,
implement and maintain these systems, which are growing to meet
a constantly rising set of demands, have to have strong
incentives, too. At Google, operations are not just an
afterthought: they are critical to the company's success, and we
want to have just as much effort and creativity in this domain
as in
new product development.
|